Think about the last time you worked on a financial plan for a family with a child or adult with special educational needs or a disability. How confident were you that the plan truly reflected what that family needs, not just now, but for the long term?

Families that include someone with special educational needs or a disability (SEND) face a distinctive set of financial challenges that conventional planning approaches often aren’t equipped to handle. The numbers are significant: around 638,700 (January 2025) children in England alone have an Education, Health and Care Plan. Behind each of those is a family navigating a lifetime of complex decisions about benefits, trusts, housing, care funding, and more. Get the planning wrong and the consequences can be serious.

As paraplanners, we’re in a position to make a real difference but only if we understand what good planning for these families actually looks like.

A chance to better understand special needs planning in one lunch hour

Join us online at 1.00 pm on Wednesday 6 May as we explore what paraplanners need to know to support families with SEND needs.

Peter Spence from Fintuity hosts this conversation with Ali Fanshawe and Rhiannon Gogh, co-founders of SENDA; specialists who work with financial, legal and charity advisers to deliver safer, smarter planning for SEND families.

Together, they’ll explore what special needs planning really involves, where traditional advice tends to fall short, and what paraplanners can do to fill that gap.

During this lunch-hour Assembly we expect to:

What can you expect to take away?

You’ll leave with a clearer understanding of where special needs planning is different. You’ll get a better understanding of what to consider when planning for SEND needs and, and where to go for training and support if you want to develop your knowledge further.

This is planning that can make a genuine difference to families who need it most — and a chance to make sure you’re equipped to deliver it.

Ready to find out more? Register now.

A promotional image for an online Assembly: Wrapper choices, changing rules and what they mean for clients. Featuring a cut out head and shoulders shot of Elaine Cruickshank, Aegon. 1pm on 22 April 2026. 1 hour CPD available.

The tax landscape has shifted significantly over the past couple of years. Allowance reductions, rising dividend tax rates and the proposed extension of IHT to unused pensions means there’s plenty for paraplanners to get to grips with — and plenty of opportunity to add real value for clients.

This Assembly is designed to cut through the complexity and give you a clearer picture of how different tax wrappers work in practice, so you can make more confident decisions about which solution is right for which client.

We’ve invited Elaine Cruickshank, tax and trusts manager at Aegon, to join host Richard Allum for a practical, no-nonsense look at onshore bonds, offshore bonds, GIAs and trust solutions — with an agnostic perspective that keeps the focus firmly on what’s best for the client in front of you.

What we’ll be exploring

We’ll look at how recent tax changes are prompting advisers and paraplanners to revisit wrapper choice, and walk through the kind of comparative thinking that helps you work out when a bond might be preferable to a GIA — or when onshore makes more sense than offshore.

We’ll also take a look at how onshore bonds are actually taxed (including a common misconception that’s worth clearing up), which wrapper tends to suit which client circumstances, and how trust solutions fit into the picture — particularly in the context of the proposed IHT changes to pensions.

What can you expect to take away?

You’ll leave with a clearer understanding of the tax treatment of different wrappers, a more confident sense of when each option is likely to work best, and some practical frameworks for thinking about trust planning solutions. We’ll share the comparative calculations in the slides afterwards, so you can refer back to them whenever you need to.

Whether you’re looking to sharpen your technical knowledge or just want to feel more confident having these conversations, join us online at 1.00 pm on Tuesday 22 April.

We’ve been recording ‘Technically speaking’ sessions with Utmost’s Steve Sayer for a few years now.

And because they offer really crunchy case-study based content, they’re really popular with paraplanners. 

But we like to plan ahead so late last year, we sat down with Steve and the team at Utmost to talk about the ‘Technically speaking’ plans for 2026. During the conversation, Steve talked about each of the major tax planning milestones that stem from the measures announced by the Chancellor since October 2024 and stretch ahead to 2031.

And when Steve revealed that he had a single slide that set out each of the changes against a timeline, we decided – there and then – that was definitely something paraplanners would like to hear more about.

So we invited Steve into the studio to talk us through it.

And here’s the result: Steve Sayer’s guide to the tax change timeline until April 2031. In it, Steve covers inheritance tax and the domicile regime, excluded property trusts and the new foreign income and gains regime, the agricultural and business property relief changes, pension death benefits in 2027, plus the effects of the freezing of tax bands until 2031.

Plus you can download his slide using the link below.

Pensions will become subject to inheritance tax (IHT) from April 2027, but how much of a role does protection play in your approach to building IHT strategies for your clients? And how confident are you about the protection options that are available to you?

But with IHT receipts expected to almost double, and sweeping changes to business and agricultural property relief already landing from April 2026, paraplanners can expect more and more clients to want to explore all the options.

So at this Assembly, host Richard Allum was joined by Alan Jenkinson, protection specialist at Scottish Widows, to walk through the essentials. During their lunch-hour discussion, Richard and Alan unpack IHT and how it works, run through the key exemptions and reliefs, and explore how protection fits into an IHT planning conversation alongside gifting strategies, trust structures and the normal expenditure out of income rules.

There’s also a really useful section on the underwriting process: what to do when a client has health risk factors, when concurrent applications make sense, and why a declined application isn’t necessarily the end of the road.

If you’re looking for a solid grounding in this area — or a practical refresher before your next client review — this one’s well worth an hour of your time.

The Government’s Finance Bill which includes the provision for pensions to become subject to inheritance tax (IHT) has reached a critical point in its progress through Parliament.

But as James Jones-Tinsley of Barnett Waddingham explains in this 15-minute briefing recorded especially for the Paraplanners’ Assembly, the measure isn’t necessarily a done deal.

Why the next few weeks matter

He suggests that the government’s recent decision to raise its proposed threshold on agricultural and business property relief from £1 million to £2.5 million indicates that the government can be persuaded to rethink its plans.

So the next few weeks matter. And that’s why James is encouraging advice professionals and clients to write to their MPs – not least to encourage the government to consider the practical consequences of its planned changes. 

For instance, how reasonable and realistic is it to expect personal representatives, many who are likely to be recently bereaved family members, to successfully negotiate their way through complex pension death benefit rules against the clock?

And is adding to the anxiety of family members worth it when the government’s own projections suggest this will raise £1.5 billion by 2029-30 – a fraction of the £6 billion that is already being collected thanks to freezing of allowances?

What you’ll learn by watching and listening

If you want to know the latest on the progress of the law resulting from last November’s budget and its consequence for advice colleagues and clients, then you’re in the right place.It’s more than a year since speculation ahead of last autumn’s Budget led to a surge of savers raiding their pension pots in a bid to beat rumoured changes to tax-free lump sums. 

But when no changes were announced and people sought to reverse their withdrawals, they discovered that the 30-day cancellation rule didn’t apply. Or did it?

That confusion over conduct of business rules led to calls for HMRC and the FCA to clarify whether or not savers could cancel – and they’ve now responded.

Budget measures are often the subject of media speculation. But the level of attention in the run-up to the Chancellor of the Exchequer’s Budget statement on 26 November 2025 was unprecedented.

So did the reality match the hype? 

For our final Assembly of 2025, we invited Les Cameron from M&G Wealth to join us and share his latest thoughts on what paraplanners need to know following Rachel Reeves’s statement.

Les covers a bunch of different topics that include:

Plus more besides. So if you want to catch up with what’s been announced, what’s changing, or what’s staying the same, this is the Assembly for you.

Assemblies featuring the M&G technical team in 2025

This is the fifth Assembly of the year featuring experts from M&G Wealth’s technical team. Here are the other four from 2025:

February 2025 – Pensions, death and taxes (with Les)
April 2025 – A guide to investment bond essentials for paraplanners (with Barrie Dawson)
August 2025 – Tax wrappers: which, why and when? (with Neil Macleod)
September 2025 – The pension IHT bombshell has landed – now what? (with Les)

When a client dies, their will isn’t necessarily the final word on how their estate gets distributed. Deeds of variation and disclaimers give beneficiaries a valuable window – two years from death – to reshape inheritances in ways that can reduce tax bills and improve family outcomes – often both.

In the latest episode in our ‘Technically speaking’ series, we invited Steve Sayer from Utmost to join host Richard Allum, to cast his expert gaze on the post-death planning issues that paraplanners need to consider.

During the hour-long session, Steve explains:

What’s more, the session also explores disclaimers – the simpler but more restrictive alternative to variations. Steve clarifies:

Throughout the episode, Steve offers examples to help illustrate concepts such as periodic charges and ten-year anniversaries.

If you’re working on suitability reports that cover post-death planning options, are supporting a client following a death, or would just like to give your technical knowledge a boost, this is the ideal ‘Technically speaking’ episode for you.

It’s more than a year since speculation ahead of last autumn’s Budget led to a surge of savers raiding their pension pots in a bid to beat rumoured changes to tax-free lump sums. 

But when no changes were announced and people sought to reverse their withdrawals, they discovered that the 30-day cancellation rule didn’t apply. Or did it?

That confusion over conduct of business rules led to calls for HMRC and the FCA to clarify whether or not savers could cancel – and they’ve now responded.

In this episode of the Paraplanners’ Assembly podcast popular Assembly expert, James Jones-Tinsley of Barnett Waddingham explains how cancellations became an issue, what the clarification means for clients, what regulatory issues the statement throws up, and what paraplanners need to know from now on.

Once upon a time, when taxes were relatively low, ISAs and unwrapped investments seemed like pretty obvious choices for clients’ money.

But the big cut in the capital gains tax allowance and rises in tax on gains and dividends has changed things. Tax wrappers that once seemed like more hassle than they were worth (like investment bonds) could now be the ideal vehicle – especially for higher rate taxpayers.

But which wrapper is right in which circumstances and why?

That’s the question that guest Neil Macleod from M&G’s technical team was invited to answer when he joined host, Leanne Pickering, for this Assembly.

What you’ll learn by listening

Over the course of one lunch hour, Leanne and Neil explored when bonds are more suitable, when offshore makes sense, and why the ‘best’ mathematical answer might not actually be the right choice for your client. In this Assembly you’ll:

You’ll discover that the right choice for your clients isn’t just about what the spreadsheet says but about the broader thinking

What’s more, once you’ve listened, follow the link below and you can request a record of 1 hour’s worth CPD too.

Last Monday (21 July 2025), the UK Government published draft legislation which means that, from April 2027, most unused pension savings and death benefits will count towards your estate when you die.

If you’re wondering…

…you’re not alone.

So in this bonus podcast episode, host Richard Allum met up with Barnett Waddingham’s James Jones-Tinsley to talk through the Government’s planned changes, what they mean for paraplanners and your clients, and suggest practical steps that you can already take to help clients get ready for the change.

The measures, which feature in the Finance Bill 2025-26, could still change as the proposals make their way through Parliament from September. But if you’re wondering where things stand right now and what you should be thinking about for clients with decent-sized pension pots, this is a fantastic update that gives you the current picture.

Speaking of the Finance Bill…

If you’ve ever wondered how Budget measures become law, James met up with Leanne Pickering of Pivotal Paraplanning last year to walk through each step in the process. Follow the link for more:

Listen: From Parliament to paraplanner: How do Budget measures become law?


And speaking of pensions…

James has recorded a series of really helpful jargon busters on new and old pensions exclusively for the Assembly. Help yourself by following these links:

New pensions jargon: part one
Listen: A plain English guide to new pensions jargon: part one
Watch: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part one

New pension jargon: part two
Listen: A plain English guide to new pensions jargon: part two
Watch: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part two

And if that’s not enough and you want OLD pensions jargon, here are links to James’s trio of episodes:

Podcasts: old pensions jargon
Listen to part one: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part one
Listen to part two: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part two
Listen to part three: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part three

Videos: old pensions jargon
Watch part one: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part one
Watch part two: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part two
Watch part three: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part three

Event pages: old pensions jargon
Event details for part one: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part one
Event details for part two: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part two
Event details for part three: A plain English guide to old pensions jargon: part three