
A Kerr-Fuffell family member has snuffed it. But was it foul play? Join paraplanner sleuths to sift for clues and crack the case.
You’re invited to a Big Day Out with a difference.
Because we’d love you to gather with paraplanners from across the UK at West Horsley Place in Surrey from 9am on Tuesday 3 November 2026.
Over the course of the day, you’ll work out which member of the Kerr-Fuffell family stood to gain most from the untimely demise of their (perhaps not so) loved one.
Our writers room of supremely well-qualified paraplanners is busily concocting a series of – fingers crossed – interconnected case studies.
Inheritance tax, pensions, estate planning, wills, lasting powers of attorney, divorce, protection – you name it – we’ll cram it in.
In other words, you’re guaranteed an agenda that will be bursting at the seams with seven hours’ worth of CPD. That’s knowledge and insights that you can apply to client cases right away.

How will the day work?
At 10am, we’ll gather in the Great Hall for your briefing on the untimely demise of Lady Fifi.
Then you’ll join one of four groups, each led by a duo of paraplanning detectives.
In a series of sessions, your group will meet with expert witnesses drawn from our supporters – that’s Aegon, Howden, M&G, Quilter, Scottish Widows, Transact and Wealthtime – to sift evidence contained in case studies.
Whoa there! Why does West Horsley Place look familiar?

If you’re a fan of the hit BBC TV comedy ‘Ghosts’, it will.
Because West Horsley Place is Button House!
And do you know what? It looks EXACTLY like it does on the telly – outside and in.
So not only will you get to take part in the Big Day Out, you can sneak a few selfies in the Great Hall, the library, that long red room upstairs, the grand staircase, the garden, even the corridor that leads to the plague pit.
What’s more, we’ll take the traditional ‘school photo’ in front of house.
How exciting is that?!
And in a happy coincidence, we’ll be gathering for our Big Day Out just one week after ‘Ghosts: The Possession of Button House’ is released in UK cinemas.
Will you feed me?

This is a Paraplanners’ Assembly event, so we won’t scrimp on the catering.
Your ticket includes breakfast baps (or butties) on arrival, a delicious hot buffet lunch, plus a sweet treat with your tea in the afternoon.
There will be vegetarian and vegan options. And if there are ingredients you need to be careful of, let us know when you book, and we’ll take care of that.
Surrey? But that’s far far away!
It’s a fair cop. For 12 years we’ve hosted events in the Midlands-ish, so it was reasonably easy for people to get to.
But getting exclusive use of a country estate for a whole day’s Whodunnit that’s just the right size for a Big Day Out – well, that’s quite tricky.
Being big ‘Ghosts’ fans, when we discovered we could have Button House to ourselves for the day, we couldn’t resist.
We know Surrey is a stretch. And if that means you don’t feel able to join us this year, we’ll make it up to you next year. Promise.
Getting there
By car: West Horsley Place is off the A246 between Guildford and Leatherhead. It’s ten minutes’ drive from the A3/M25 intersection. Leave the A3 at junction 10. You can park for free in the visitor car park.
By train: Horsley station is one mile away, with frequent trains from London Waterloo (49-minute journey), Vauxhall, Clapham Junction and Guildford (14-minute journey). Woking station is 8 miles away, with frequent, fast trains to and from London. It takes about 25 minutes to walk from the station to West Horsley Place. It is a lovely walk through the estate, but you will need footwear suitable for wet, muddy or uneven ground. Follow the bridleway and you’ll arrive in the car park and welcome area.
By bus: The 479 Guildford-Bookham-Leatherhead-Epsom service operates roughly hourly. The nearest stop is East Horsley, Duke of Wellington. It takes approximately 7 minutes to walk from the stop. The entrance to West Horsley Place is on the right before you reach St Mary’s Church. Walk down the drive to reach the Welcome Area next to the Barn.
Here’s the bus timetable: Service 479
Where to stay
West Horsley Place has plenty of places to stay. There are two large hotels within three mins of the Big Day Out venue:
De Vere Horsley Estate
Thatchers Hotel
Within 15 minutes’ drive:
What to wear
West Horsley Place is heated throughout. But it’s a rambling old country pile with flagstone floors on the ground floor, so we’re suggesting you dress for cosy toes and tops (and – what’s to lose – cosy everywhere really too).
Is West Horsley Place accessible?
The ground floor of the Manor House is wheelchair accessible, with a platform lift to the first floor. If you’d find the short walk – or gravel path – from the car park difficult, let us know when you book and we’ll contact the team at West Horsley to make sure you’re looked after when you arrive.
Book your spot now
A Big Day Out Whodunnit costs £50. But there are limited places, so don’t hang about. To book your spot now, follow this link:
Group bookings
We’ve limited group bookings to five places. If you want to book more than that, email us and we’ll add you to the waiting list.

Temporary guarantees in retirement income planning are nothing new. But how much do you actually know about how they work?
Join us at 1.00pm on Wednesday 23 September as we take a practical look at temporary guarantees, and what they mean for the planning you’re involved in.
Host Richard Allum is joined by M&G’s Mark Devlin for this conversation.
During this Assembly we’ll cover:
- what temporary guarantees are and how they work
- the options available to clients
- what happens to death benefits
- why you might consider using them in a client’s retirement plan
Expect a couple of real-world case studies to bring it all to life.
What can you expect to take away?
A clearer, more practical understanding of temporary guarantees, and a sense of when and why they might be worth putting in front of a client.
Ready to top up your knowledge? Save your spot now.
In this month’s Self-Assembly Paraplanning Show, host and ParaplanX founder Jawaad Tanwir is joined by Ceetal Katechia from Cooper Parry Wealth and Luke Sparkes from Sparkes Paraplanning for this month’s unscripted conversation in which paraplanners compare notes on what’s happening in their world and the wider paraplanning profession.
Among the things on Jawaad, Ceetal and Luke’s minds in September 2026 are:
- The incoming pension and IHT changes – especially the work they’re doing to help clients try to simplify things before April 2027
- The way the focus of client and adviser conversations have shifted from decades of ‘don’t touch your pension’ to factoring pension savings into IHT calculations – it’s a big change
- The FCA’s simplified advice proposals: what could a more streamlined process mean for the advice gap? Is there a risk of sacrificing the place of professional judgment in the interests of speed? Could a reduced suitability letter serve some clients better anyway?
- Where AI does and doesn’t fit into paraplanning
- UK life expectancy fell over the last decade so what might that mean for cashflow assumptions?
- And more generally, what are the wider forces shaping how people plan for their financial futures?
This is a wide-ranging chat among paraplanners which covers some crunchy and very topical issues. Is what’s on your mind on the mind of other paraplanners? Listen now and find out.
You may like to know…
Thanks for your interest in this Self-Assembly Paraplanning Show. Just so you know, guests appear in a personal capacity and not on behalf of the business that employs them.
AI in this episode
We used Adobe Podcast’s Enhance tool to clean up audio levels and quality, and Podcastle’s text-to-voice feature to generate the listener message at the start of the episode. We use Canva’s background remover for the head-and-shoulder shots of Jawaad, Ceetal and Luke in the featured image for this episode.
In their regular quarterly political catch-up, host Leanne Pickering from Pivotal Paraplanning and self-invested pensions technical specialist at Barnett Waddingham (soon to be called Howden), James Jones-Tinsley, to chat about political goings on over Parliament’s summer recess, and what paraplanners should look out for in the new Parliamentary session.
Their conversation covers:
- Andy Burnham’s by-election win and rise to become the UK’s new Prime Minister
- Ministerial appointments in Burnham’s first Cabinet reshuffle including the arrival of John Healey as Chancellor of the Exchequer
- The Clacton by-election and what Reform’s result there might tell us about the wider picture
- The run-up to the 28 October Budget – including possible changes to capital gains tax and a windfall tax on oil companies or banks; and
- Gaps left in HMRC’s technical guidance on IHT and pensions – and the pressure that puts on personal representatives
Leanne and James also discuss whether the new Prime Minister might call a snap election, and whether the IHT on pensions rules could yet change before April 2027.
So if you like to keep half an eye on Westminster, this one’s well worth your time.
The near-Dickensian language of a Will doesn’t half make the clarity of its contents harder to grasp, doesn’t it?
And then there’s LPAs, which come with limits that catch you out. Things like what an attorney can and can’t gift, whether they can set up a trust, what happens if the attorney themselves loses capacity.
So if you’re prone to befuddlement – and, let’s be honest, who isn’t? – then tune into this conversation with Shaun Moore, Technical Specialist at Quilter.
Because Shaun joined us for a lunch-hour conversation that’s all about deciphering what wills and LPAs actually say.
But this isn’t about which form to fill in or which portal to log into. It’s a planning conversation about why these documents matter, what they can and can’t do, and what paraplanners need to look out for.
And with pensions becoming vulnerable to IHT, and plenty of plans now out of date, this is the ideal time to revisit both documents.
So during this Assembly we covered
- why pensions coming into the estate means old wills need a second look
- Residence Nil Rate Band (RNRB) pitfalls and old discretionary trusts left over from before the transferable nil rate band
- deeds of variation, and what your options are when a will hasn’t been drafted well
- investment powers in will trusts, including bonds for life tenants, STEP provisions and when the Trustee Act 2000 defaults apply
- the limits on what an attorney can do, including gifting and setting up trusts
- LPAs and discretionary fund management, and the Office of the Public Guardian’s reversed guidance on discretionary fund management (now allowed unless the document says otherwise)
- what happens when an attorney themselves loses capacity, and whether a will can be changed or revoked
What can you expect to take away?
Watch or listen and you’ll gain a clearer idea of the role of wills and LPAs so you can spot the planning opportunities.

Are you an outsourced paraplanner?
Whether you’re the only employee of your paraplanning practice, or you lead a paraplanning powerhouse with employees and a hefty bank of clients, outsourced paraplanners share lots of things in common.
You just do.
But here’s the thing: despite the growing number of outsourced paraplanners in the UK these days, opportunities to get together to talk only about things that matter in the outsourced world, are surprisingly few and far between.
Switch off. Show up. Join in.
So, if you’re an outsourced paraplanner, here’s our invitation: at 1pm on Thursday 29 October 2026, set your notifications to ‘do not disturb’, click on the Zoom link in your event invitation and gather with other outsourced paraplanners across the UK for an hour of conversation, ideas and practical insights.
There’s nothing to prepare.
We’re starting this Assembly discussing fees and see where it goes from there.
Spaces are limited. To save a spot hit ‘Book Event’ and look out for the calendar invitation in your inbox.
Would you trust a fun fact you can’t find in black and white?
That’s just one of the questions rattling around in this episode – the first-ever podcast-only instalment of the Self-Assembly Paraplanning Show. It’s a regular, unscripted conversation where a small group of paraplanners compare notes on what’s actually happening in their world.
This episode’s host Sam Tonks, is joined by Julie South, who runs outsourced paraplanning business, Bee Paraplanning, and Steven McBurnie, a Senior Associate at RBC Brewin Dolphin and is currently on the pathway to becoming client-facing.
Across the hour they cover:
- when is a ‘fun fact’ actually ‘fact’? How do you know and why does it matter?
- CPD opportunities hiding in plain sight – why “research before a case” counts as CPD
- AI in paraplanning – where it genuinely helps (source-checking, drafting) and why it hasn’t replaced the trust between adviser and paraplanner
- GP records, data silos, and why medical underwriting keeps stalling protection cases, and the wider frustration of providers who won’t pick up the phone
- smart glasses, meeting recording, and where data collection starts to feel like too much
- clients turning up to meetings having already run their suitability report through ChatGPT or Copilot
The episode wraps up with events for your diary and some very unfinancial recommendations for the Summer holidays.
Years of frozen allowances has resulted in more and more clients feeling the effect of fiscal drag – when more of your wealth becomes vulnerable to tax.
So understanding fiscal drag and what its effects mean for clients, is a really important feature of day-to-day paraplanning.
That’s why we invited Utmost International’s technical sales manager, Steve Sayer, to share his thoughts on fiscal drag and how paraplanners can consider addressing it.
Steve explains how, for instance, allowances have lost real value and the capital gains tax exemption has shrunk. And how the frozen nil rate band means more estates than ever are being pulled into inheritance tax.
But in this in-depth technical session – which features a case study example along the way – Steve illustrates how the careful application of planning strategies using trusts, and onshore and offshore bonds, mean the negative consequences of fiscal drag needn’t be inevitable.
Over the years, Steve has created a series of technical Assemblies that have become some of the most popular episodes we have published among paraplanners. Tune in now and find out why.
Even very experienced paraplanners can trip over obstacles lurking in the shadows of IHT.
So we invited Aegon’s tax and trusts manager, Elaine Cruickshank, to join host, Richard Allum, for an online Assembly to help you dodge the IHT perils.
Over the course of one lunch-hour, Elaine:
- untangles the transferable nil rate band and residence nil rate band, including the detail that trips people up around second marriages and downsizing provisions
- gets into the finer points of gifting exemptions, PETs and CLTs, beyond the seven-year headline
- explains how the inclusion of pensions in estates affects the taper threshold, and what that means for clients close to the £2 million mark
- works through charitable giving and the 36% rate, including the added complications once pension funds are in the mix
- brings it all together with planning opportunities you can take straight back to your desk
What can you expect to take away?
Watch or listen now and you’ll have a sharper grasp of the IHT detail that’s easy to get wrong. Plus the confidence to spot these issues in your own client cases.
Watch or listen now
Missed it? Then follow the links below to download Elaine’s slides, watch the replay or catch up with the podcast now.
The outstanding questions
There were so many questions on this Assembly that we ran out of time, so Elaine has provided us with the answers to the outstanding questions, as well as provide a clarification on the final question of the Assembly.
Can the small gifts exemption and the annual £3,000 exemption be given to the same recipient?
If a gift in excess of the £250 small gifts exemption is made, then as this gift is more than the small gifts exemption, the full gift would be allocated against the annual exemption (assuming that this was available).
Why is it called Inheritance Tax? Shouldn’t it be called Estate Tax, as it is (normally) the estate that pays?
“Inheritance Tax” is a better reflection of what the tax is intended to cover — rather than simply being a tax on an estate at death, there could also be IHT applying to lifetime transfers.
Is it best to space significant gifts at least 7 years apart then?
Each gift has its own 7-year clock, but whenever a gift is being made you have to consider the cumulative impact of any gifts made in the previous 7 years. If the donor dies within 7 years of a gift, earlier gifts use up the nil-rate band first before later gifts are considered. Making very large gifts close together can therefore increase the IHT exposure of later gifts, if death occurs within 7 years. Taper relief may reduce the IHT on gifts made more than 3 years before death, but it does not reduce the value of the gift itself for nil-rate band purposes.
Does tax-free income from a beneficiary’s pension (where the spouse dies under age 75), either through an annuity or under FAD, count towards regular income when considering gifting out of surplus income?
This is a grey area and will probably require a tax case to provide clarification. As this money is completely exempt from income tax, HMRC could view the regular withdrawals of this nature as capital rather than income.
Is there a length of time for the ‘main residence’ qualification to be lost?
For the Residence Nil Rate Band, there is no specific minimum or maximum period between the property ceasing to be the deceased’s main residence and their death. The key point is that the property must have been a qualifying residential interest, meaning a property that the deceased occupied as a residence at some point during their ownership. For the downsizing addition, they have to downsize or dispose of the property on or after 8 July 2015, but there is no stipulated timeframe between the date of downsizing/disposal and death.
What if they still own the property but have also moved into a care home?
A property can qualify even if the individual was living in a care home at death, provided the property had been their main residence at some point and they leave the property to their direct descendants. The amount of residence nil rate band available will generally be the lower of the available RNRB and the value of the qualifying residential interest passing to direct descendants, and it may also be reduced by the taper reduction if the estate exceeds £2 million.
If they own a house worth less than the RNRB, should they upsize to make the most of it?
If they upsize and buy a bigger house, the value of the estate would generally remain unchanged — they now have a larger property and less cash. However, if they live in the bigger property as their main residence and leave this to their direct descendants in their will, then they could in theory qualify for the full residence nil rate band if the value of the house was equal to or higher than the residence nil rate band and the £2,000,000 tapering threshold was not breached. However, tax mitigation isn’t the only factor to consider here — there would be the costs of moving house, larger council tax and utility bills etc, which could be more significant than any IHT saving achieved.
Can RNRB apply to an IIP trust, where some people have moved their home into a solicitor’s trust and continued to live in it?
It sounds as though this type of arrangement would potentially be a gift with reservation of benefit, with the value of the property remaining in their IHT estates. Whether or not the RNRB would apply in this scenario would depend on the provisions of the trust. Are the direct descendants the beneficiaries of the trust, and do the trust provisions meet the conditions of ‘directly inheriting’ the property?
What actually goes into the total cost a client pays for their platform? That’s the question that this episode sets out to answer.
And to do it host Richard Allum is joined by Transact CEO, Tom Dunbar, who covers the four components that contribute to charges: the annual platform charge, wrapper fees, brokerage fees, and any cash interest retention.
Along the way Richard and Tom explore how annual charges are typically tiered, why family linking can make a real difference for smaller portfolios, how wrapper fees scale with the complexity of the product, and where brokerage fees do (and don’t) add up.
Finally, the conversation turns to the issue of cash interest retention – the gap between what a platform earns on client cash and what it pays out – and how it differs from platform to platform.
Tom explains why Transact has taken a firm stance on the issue, and why retention of interest plus ‘double dipping’ and ‘triple dipping’ have become a focus for the FCA.